Now, if you have a DVD player that outputs both interlaced i and progressive scan p, do you end up with the same result either way? The answer is Frequently, as you've probably heard, the p signal from the DVD player is better. A DVD is encoded in digital component interlaced format. Frames must be assembled into sequential progressive scan format within the DVD player for it to output a p signal. This deinterlacing happens in the digital domain before the information is converted to analog for transmission.
So in theory a good deinterlacer in the DVD player has the best chance of assembling the cleanest signal. It simply converts the signal to analog for transmission to the projector unless it has DVI output, which almost none of them have at the moment. The projector then converts the incoming analog signal back to digital and does the deinterlacing internally. Furthermore, it is quite possible that the projector has more comprehensive deinterlacing and video processing logic on board than does the DVD player.
User Info: looked. So yeah, Dreamcast and PlayStation 2. Quick question: do you think that 2K monitors will go down in history as the new arcade p with the advent of Ultra HD? The cranky hermit posted More topics from this board Keep me logged in on this device. Forgot your username or password? User Info: Shamrock99 Shamrock99 3 years ago 1 Which do you prefer if a game allows this? Just wondering what y'all prefer when given the choice.
MadWorld does i, so no, not all Wii games do p. There are a number of games that are only interlaced. If you wish to view the Wii console with a higher quality image, component video cables can be purchased instead. Wii consoles come with default composite cables that feature a single video cable and two audio jacks. Component cables split up the video connection through three plugs.
When doing this, you may have a blurry picture that needs adjustments through the physical cables and the Wii console settings. Because if your DVD player is not progressive scan, it probably doesn't have anything better than an S-Video out. Deinterlacing a movie is the easiest case since all of the original progressive information is present.
It's also the most common scenario in which people expect high quality. So there's no reason to doubt your TV manufacturers got it right.
The point of buying a progressive-scan DVD player is that there are some cases where looking at the video stream alone isn't enough to make the right deinterlacing choices -- the MPEG2 flags aren't passed over your video cables. Also, their overall output quality tends to be a lot higher than cheapo players that only do s-video. Not really. Interlacing was invented as a way to maintain the appearance of smooth motion while requiring less bandwidth. What you're losing is half of your vertical sharpness.
0コメント